From the 50 Years Ago section of Scientific American
Scientific American, January 1951
By Isaac Isidor
Rabi
DIANETICS: THE MODERN SCIENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH, BY L. RON
HUBBARD. Hermitage
House ($4.00). This volume probably contains more promises
and less evidence
per page than has any publication since the invention of
printing. Briefly,
its thesis is that man is intrinsically good, has a
perfect memory for every
event of his life, and is a good deal more
intelligent than he appears to
be. However, something called the engram
prevents these characteristics from
being realized in man's behavior. During
moments of unconsciousness and pain
and at any time from conception onward,
the "reactive mind" can still record
experience, but experiences so recorded
-engrams- are a major source of
man's misery, his psychosomatic ills, his
neuroses and psychoses, his poor
memory, and his generally inefficient
functioning. By a process called
dianetic reverie, which resembles hypnosis
and which may apparently be
practiced by anyone trained in dianetics, these
engrams may be recalled.
Once thoroughly recalled, they are "refiled," and
the patient becomes a
"clear," who is not handicapped by encumbering engrams
and who can
thenceforth function at a level of intellect, efficiency and
goodness seldom
if ever realized before in the history of man. The system is
presented
without qualification and without evidence. It has borrowed
from
psychoanalysis, Pavlovian conditioning, hypnosis and folk beliefs,
but,
except for the last, these debts are fulsomely denied. The huge sale of
the
book to date is distressing evidence of the frustrated ambitions,
hopes,
ideals, anxieties and worries of the many persons who through it have
sought
succor.
I.I. Rabi, winner of the Nobel prize in physics in
1944, is professor of
physics at Columbia
University.
http://nobel.sdsc.edu/laureates/physics-1944.html
And this tidbit from the APA
"Psychologists act against Dianetics", by Lucy Freeman, New York
Times,
9/9/50
The American Psychological Association today called
on
psychologists, "in the public interest," not to use in therapy
the
techniques "peculiar" to a new approach in mental health
called
Dianetics. It is outlined in a book of the same name.
The action
was taken in a resolution adopted by the Council of
Representatives,
governing body of the association, at its closing
season.
The association
stated that "in view of the sweeping
generalizations and claims regarding
psychology and psychotherapy made
by L. Ron Hubbard in his recent book
"Dianetics," the American
Psychological Association adopts the following
resolution:
"'While suspending judgment concerning the eventual validity of
the
claims made by the author of "Dianetics," the association
calls
attention to the fact that these claims are not supported by
empirical
evidence of the sort required for the establishment of
scientific
generalizations. In the public interest, the association, in
the
absence of such evidence, recommends to its members that the use
of
the techniques peculiar to Dianetics be limited to
scientific
investigations designed to test the validity of its
claims.'."
The book, now a best-seller since its publication several
months
ago, has been the subject of discussion in psychological
and
psychiatric circles. The psychologists represent the first
scientific
group to take official action against it and did so only after
long
deliberations.
In explaining the action of the council, Dr. E. Lowell
Kelly, a
member of it and of the board of directors, said, "what we have
here
is a man who claims he has discovered an exact science of the mind
and
developed a technique of therapy which goes far beyond that known
to
psychology, psychiatry, and psychoanalysis."
He described the technique
advanced in the book as "as a
hodge-podge of accepted therapeutic techniques
with new names."
One of the main objections to the book made by psychologists
is its
contention that anyone, having read it, may practice
therapy
successfully without danger to the patient. There is no evidence
in
support of this view and "considerable evidence against it," Dr.
Kelley
declared.
Mr. Hubbard is described by his publishers as "a mathematician
and
theoretical philosopher." The book is titled "Dianetics, the
Modern
Science of Mental Health, a Handbook of Dianetic Thereapy."
The
preface states that the author has discovered a technique "which
will
invariably cure all psychosomatic ills and human aberrations."
In
another recommendation, the council "strongly urged" the 8,000
members of the
association, as individuals, to offer "tangible
support, in all possible
ways, financial and otherwise, to their
collegues whose connections with the
University of California at
Berkeley have been severed by recent action of
the Regents."
In New York, neither Mr. Hubbard nor a spokesman for his
publisher
could be reached last night for comment
"An individual processed with the aid of the E-meter was said to reach the intended goal of "clear" and was led to believe there was reliable scientific proof that once cleared many, indeed most illnesses would automatically be cured. Auditing was guaranteed to be successful. All this was and is false -- in short, a fraud. " Federal District Judge Gesell 333 F. Supp. 357; 1971 U.S. Dist